INCTR
8th
meeting on Cancer in Countries with Limited Resources, Antalya,
Turkey, 22-24 March 2009 – report by Denis Strangman (Chair, IBTA).
The International Network for Cancer
Treatment and Research
(INCTR) is based
in Brussels
and headed by Dr Ian Magrath
who is an expert
in the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas. INCTR was founded by the
International Union Against
Cancer (UICC) and the Institut
Pasteur, Brussels.
Its goals include assisting in controlling cancer in developing
countries.
200 people participated in the Antalya
meeting
where there was a full program of presentations at plenary sessions
and workshops.

Conference session
I attended the Antalya
meeting, while travelling
to the EORTC/EANO meeting on central nervous system malignancies, in
the hope
of identifying new contacts for the IBTA’s
project to
publicise the treatment situation of brain tumour patients in low to
middle
income countries (LMIC) and also to gain a better understanding of
cancer
control in these countries.
The only direct mention of brain tumours
during the conference were references in two of the
posters but I
was able to make a number of useful personal contacts. The organisers
also
assisted by distributing a handout mentioning the IBTA project (click here
to access).
My overwhelming impression is that
brain tumours, because of
their relatively low incidence and their poor prognosis, do not rate
highly in
research or interest in the low to middle income countries. They are
not easily treatable and other cancers
and other diseases (e.g. TB) and malnutrition and tobacco control,
which have a higher impact, more
public visibility and greater potential for treatment, are given a
higher priority.
We know that at least 70% of the
annual number
of 200,000 new cases worldwide of malignant primary brain tumours occur
in LMI countries. From messages received by the IBTA many people in
these
countries are unable to access what would be regarded as standard
therapy for
their tumour in developed countries. In some cases their tumour remains
undiagnosed
and many simply become patients at the end stage of their illness in
woefully
inadequate local health services or, if they are lucky, looked after by
members of a palliative care team.
The raising of the standard of care
for brain tumour
patients in these countries will take many years. Efforts to transfer
knowledge, particularly by professional education, and to provide
equipment and
treatment facilities, have their place and are important. In the
meantime the most immediate needs
are related to those
patients in LMIC in a palliative situation. While the needs of all end
of life
patients deserve our greatest possible attention members of the
international
brain tumour community should focus some of their attention on the specific needs of brain tumour patients
who are in the end stages
of their illness. That means adequate access to dexamethasone for brain
swelling, morphine for pain control, and anti-convulsant medications.
The
proceedings
Early in the proceedings Dr
Twalib
Ngoma, a
radiation oncologist from Tanzania
and President of AORTIC
(African Association for Research and Training in Cancer), received the
Nazil-el-Maswla Award
and Dr Giuseppe Masera
(Italy)
the Paul P. Carnone
Award in recognition of
outstanding anti-cancer work. AORTIC recently translated into French an
item
about the IBTA and published it in its electronic newsletter.
In his acceptance
address Dr Ngoma said
that there are 669 million
people in Africa
and there is much late stage
presentation by cancer patients to hospitals. He told the meeting that
“…when I
was in medical school I was told that cancer was rare in Africa.
Now, GLOBOCAN data shows that the majority of the global cancer burden
occurs
in developing countries.” He suggested there should be a specific goal
for
cancer in the Millenium Development Goals. Dr Masera said that of a
world total
of 200,000 paediatric cancer case, 85% occur in low income countries.
INCTR President Dr Ian Magrath
said that of 7.6 million deaths worldwide in 2002 due to cancer 70%
occurred in
developing countries. In these countries 800 million people exist on an
income
of less than $496 USD per year. He pointed out that access to radiation
therapy
for cancer was maldistributed
with Tanzania,
for
example, having only three radiation therapy machines. While the USA
has 18.7%
of the world’s cancer cases it consumes 61% of the world’s cancer
drugs. Less
that half of 1% in India
have access to palliative
care.
Dr Ian Magrath, Dr Ngoma, and Dr Joe Harford
(Director of the Office
of International Affairs at the US National Cancer Institute)
played key roles at the Antalya conference, often speaking from the
floor in discussions that followed presentations. IBTA
Co-Director Kathy Oliver and I had briefed Dr Harford about the IBTA
and its work at the UICC conference in Geneva last year and I also
briefed him on the IBTA's LMIC project at Antalya.
In recognition of the inextricable
connection between cancer treatment and palliative care INCTR has a
special palliative care program called PAX
(Palliative Care Access Programme). In a presentation Fraser
Black (Canada)
talked
about the WHO opioid availability program where much work needs to be
done. There is a plan to develop regional
palliative care centres.
In the paediatric cancer area a major
problem in the less
developed countries is retinoblastoma.
Dr Francis Crawley,
Executive Director of the Good Clinical Practice group
in Belgium
gave an interesting presentation on ethical issues in research in
developing
countries. I made the point in the discussion period about the need to
provide
for patient representation on ethics committees, with which Crawley
agreed. [EORTC has apparently discussed the issue of patient
involvement in the
development of clinical trial protocols, which the IBTA is pursuing.]
In an early morning palliative care
workshop a presenter
from Nepal
talked about efforts to promote palliative care in his country. In his
hospital
they commenced with 4 beds and increased to 10 beds. There are more
patients in
home care than in hospice. Morphine there is very cheap. A discussant
said that
in their country, Pakistan,
morphine cannot be administered for more than two weeks. As is often
the case
elsewhere, people who are dying seek curative help.
Dr Stuart Bell
from the National Cancer Research
Institute in the UK
spoke on infomatics,
which is basically an attempt to
make better use of the cancer research data generated. Each year worldwide there are 250,000 patients involved
in Phase
I, II and III clinical trials. By way of illustration of the lack of
transfer
of information, there are 10 million Doctors worldwide and only 30,000
subscribers to The Lancet, one of the premier medical magazines. Telepathology is an area with
potential and involves the
electronic transmission of pathological images. [In conversation with
me Stuart
mentioned that he is also involved with EANO in a neuro-oncology
initiative.]
Masoud
Samiei runs
the PACT
organisation, which was
established by the International Atomic Energy Association, as a cancer
control
organisation. There is a lack of radiation therapy machines but
“machines don’t
treat people, people treat people”. The Asian Pacific area is
particularly
poorly off in this area. It costs about $5-$6m to establish a cancer
centre with 10-12 staff in
a developing country.
Hassan
el Sohl from Saudi
Arabia talked about the
value
of telemedicine.
It can provide a second opinion. They have a fibre optic
system linking 18 treatment sites in his country. If it was not
available a
patient might have to take a flight of two hours to the capital.
Originally it
cost $200,000 per centre to establish but the cost is now down to
$30,000. [See
references in previous E-News issues to a program being run from a US
hospital which provides a web-based discussion session for brain tumour
neurosurgical cases.]
Dr Larry Lessin from the
Washington Cancer Institute described the Open Educational Resources
for
Cancer, which is a web-based resource for cancer education. See: http://oerc-international.org/
which
has this succinct descriptive statement by the UICC of the challenges
posed by
cancer: “Cancer kills more people than AIDS, TB and malaria combined,
and the
death toll is set to rise dramatically over coming decades unless
concerted
action is taken now. In the few years since the start of the 21st
century,
cancer has already cost almost as many lives as the whole of World War
II - the
single deadliest conflict the world has ever seen. The global cancer
burden is
increasing rapidly with growth driven largely by the ageing of the
world's
population. By 2030 it is estimated that over 12 million people will
die of
this disease every year. More than 70% of these deaths will occur in
low- and
middle-income countries, where resources available for cancer control
are
limited or nonexistent.”
Dr Kathleen Foley
of the Open Society
Institute gave
a keynote lecture on palliative care. She mentioned the work by David
Clark at
the University
of Lancaster
who maintains
the “International Observatory On
End of Life Care”.
See: http://www.eolc-observatory.net/index.htm
[This may be a useful resource for validating the IBTA’s
proposed pen pictures of the standard of care for brain tumour patients
in
LMIC.] Dr Foley argued that pain control is an important issue in
palliative
care and that we should campaign for pain relief as a universal human
right.
The International Narcotics Control Board needed to focus on access,
not just
on control. [In subsequent discussions Dr Foley was briefed about the IBTA’s standard of care in LMIC
project.]
In an early morning workshop Claudia
Epelman
from the Santa Marcelina
Hospital, Brazil, spoke
about psychosocial aspects of paediatric oncology. She said that this
support
should be provided by a multi disciplinary team and should not be
reserved for
those with immediate problems. Open communication should be established
at the
time of diagnosis. Siblings should be involved. 40% of the paediatric
patients
at her institution are enrolled in clinical trials. The most difficult
to deal
with are the adolescents who seek to demonstrate their independence
from the
processes. Some of the young patients wish to talk about death, others
do not.
Very young patients can show their feelings by drawing. “In my
experience they
always know when something very bad is going on.” [Claudia and her
husband Sidnei have
formed an organisation, TUCCA, for children and
adolescents with cancer which has a particular interest in brain
tumours. See: http://www.tucca.org.br/
]
Dr Margaret Borok Williams
(Zimbabwe)
spoke of her work with Kaposi
sarcoma, which is the most common cancer in
several African countries. It parallels the AIDS epidemic. She has
observed a
marked reduction in the mean age of presentation. There are non-sexual
routes
of transmission. Median life expectancy is under six months. Use of
radiation
therapy in treatment is patchy. A major problem is that she cannot
access all
appropriate drugs for this cancer. [In subsequent discussions Dr
Williams
explained to me the situation regarding the difficulties of importing
therapeutic drugs into
Zimbabwe.]
Dr Mostafa
Nokta
from the National Cancer Institute spoke about the development of AIDS
treatment networks. He said that a US Presidential Plan has promised
$48B over
five years for HIV, AIDS, TB and Malaria treatment. There is also the
Global
Fund, which has $11.4B.
In a discussion about mesothelioma
in Turkey
a Doctor recounted how a patient had failed to be diagnosed correctly.
The
patient stole his hospital file to seek another opinion and again
failing to
obtain proper treatment he stabbed himself 13 times. The Doctor
mentioned that
in an area with a high mesothelioma rate he had also seen a number of
brain
cancer cases.
Professor Indraneel Mittra from New Delhi
delivered a controversial presentation about the
effectiveness of breast cancer screening, arguing that “The end point
of
screening is reduction in mortality, not early diagnosis”. He said that
opportunistic screening by commercial companies does not tell us
anything. He
wondered if there are dangers in routine mammography.
Dr Nuran
Bese
from Turkey
spoke about breast cancer treatment. He made the point that
linear accelerators as used in developed countries cost funds to
maintain in
LMIC. By way of illustration of the challenges they face, if cancer
staff work
on a public holiday in Turkey
they are not paid.
Dr Vahit
Ozmen
(Turkey)
argued that the breast cancer guidelines developed in Western countries
cannot
be realistically applied in LMIC because of the limited health care
resources.
He mentioned that in Turkey
there are 84 cancer centres in 81 cities.
Posters:
Dr Volkan Hazar of Antalya, Turkey,
displayed a poster about PNET
treatment at his institution. Of 30 patients “with a
median follow up of 36
months, event-free survival and overall survival were 64% at 2 years,
52% at
5-10 years and 74% at 2 years, 60% at 5 years, 55% at 10 years,
respectively”. Dr
Bilghan Yalcin from Ankara,
Turkey,
reported on the experience with pontine gliomas
in children at his institution.
He stated “Excluding the single patient with longest survival no
patient
survived >27 months. Irradiated patients (n=73, media EFS = 5
months) had
significantly better survival than patients who received no therapy
(n=25, median
EFS= 0.1 month). Patients who received chemotherapy in addition to
radiotherapy
(n = 43, median EFS = 6 months) survived significantly longer than
others
(n=55, median EFS = 1 month).”

PNET
poster
In another poster about Russian
experiences in a specific region 23.38%
cancers were diagnosed in an advanced stage.
In a study of paediatric cancers in HoChiMinh
city (Vietnam)
brain tumours were number 3 (10%) in the top 10 paeditaric
malignancies for both sexes, following leukaemias
and
lymphomas.
In an interesting poster from an
Indian centre it was stated
that wheat grass juice had proved effective in
increasing the
haemoglobin level in anaemic patients.
Other
discussions:
An oncologist from a Latin American country suggested to me that 20% of
brain
tumours in their country probably went undiagnosed. Another oncologist
from South
Africa
mentioned that they received many requests from other African countries
seeking
help with treatment but when told of the costs involved the patients
did not
proceed. A pharmacist from an African country said that one month’s
supply of temozolomide would cost the
equivalent of about $5000 USD
and there was no government subsidisation for it. He said that
dexamethasone
was relatively cheap and most could afford anti-seizure medications but
opioids were only
available in the main treatment centres.